Log in

Log in
Follow us on social media at:


Message from the Executive Council

August 30, 2021


Colleagues of the AAIS and AATI,


The officers of the AAIS and the executive council of the AATI are pleased to announce a series of collaborations intended to strengthen the relationship between the two organizations as well as advance Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) initiatives in Italian Studies. Building upon the ongoing collaborations outlined briefly below, and with the ease and accessibility of online technologies, the AAIS/AATI present a series of linked initiatives aimed to serve the membership of both associations, as well as the future of Italian Studies at large.

1. AAIS and AATI 2022 Conferences

Both organizations will hold conferences in Italy next summer. 

To facilitate attendance and encourage interaction at both meetings, planning committees from the associations have successfully scheduled back-to-back conferences: AATI will meet in Lucca May 25-29 and the brick-and-mortar AAIS conference will take place in Bologna May 29-June 1. 

Members attending both conferences will receive a 10% discount off each registration fee: registration for the conferences will be done separately; that is, if you are attending both conferences, you will register for both. Further details on registering for both conferences will be available in the Spring.

2. Future AAIS/AATI Annual Conferences

To advocate for the cross-pollination of memberships of both associations at annual meetings, the associations have reciprocally extended invitations for guaranteed sessions beginning summer 2022. 

The mutual invitations offer opportunities for linked panels and collaborative activities on common themes and challenges Italian Studies currently faces, including, for example: diversity within the IS curriculum and faculty, the state of graduate studies, and issues of enrollment and retention. 

3. Modern Language Association (MLA) Conference Collaborations

Both associations are affiliate members of the MLA, which promotes partnerships between associations. With this in mind, we aim to organize one co-sponsored AAIS/AATI Special Session for the 2023 MLA Conference. Details about the composition will be forthcoming by the end of the calendar year, but the panel’s objective is to advance DEI initiatives in both organizations and will bear in mind constituencies of both associations, including pedagogy. 

4. Mentorship

The mentorship workshop that had been scheduled for the 2020 AAIS-AATI joint conference, which was cancelled due to the Covid pandemic, came to fruition at the virtual AAIS conference this year. We offer thanks to Michael Lettieri and Monica Seger for their efforts. 

AAIS and AATI propose a follow-up, joint workshop to be held online at the beginning of October 2021.

The workshop will allow current mentees and mentors to check in with fellow participants and invite new members to join the program. 

Further details will be forthcoming shortly.

5. Promotion of Diverse IS Curricula: Panel discussion and workshop proposed for February 2022 

Members of both associations have communicated an interest in diversifying the IS curriculum as well as faculty ranks. 

This online gathering, which is in the planning phase, will feature both presentations as well as opportunities for discussion in a workshop atmosphere.

6. Advocacy for Italian programs and positions. 

Finally, the AAIS and AATI, along with other IS associations, have been engaging in common actions of advocacy for programs and positions. Thanks to Marina Melita for her organizational efforts on this front. 

We hope AAIS and AATI members will share the excitement of the officers about the affordances of these collaborations. We welcome your suggestions about these, or other similar events that might also strengthen our relationship. 

Very truly, 

AAIS Executive Council                                              AATI Executive Council

    Previous messages from the Executive Council:

    June 7, 2020

    The AAIS condemns the continued racist violence enacted on black lives, in the US as elsewhere. We stand in solidarity with protest at the recent murders of George Floyd, Breonna Taylor, Ahmaud Arbery, Tony McDade and so many others. We stand in solidarity with the resistance to the everyday racial injustices that Christian Cooper’s Central Park experience exemplifies. 

    As an association of scholars based in fields within the humanities, we strive to act upon humanist beliefs “which stress the potential value and goodness of human beings, emphasize common human needs, and seek [….] ways of solving human problems” (OED). It is clear that we are still facing grave human problems surrounding racial justice. Now, more than ever, we must examine our roles as scholars and educators in a broader community of learning, and consider the ways in which our work advances necessary conversations about justice and equality, while also lifting up voices, experiences, and texts that have too often been kept at the margins.

    As the American Association of Italian Studies, we negotiate the intercultural dynamics between those identities—American and Italian—and try to draw meaningful correspondences between what we study and teach, and where. We do this for our students and we do it for ourselves. In recent years the Association has sought to host roundtables, workshops, and plenaries at our annual conference raising and addressing questions of diversity and inclusion in Italian Studies. We recognize that we can do more, and we want to. It is time to critically examine our own participation in deeply rooted expressions of structural racism, and to actively work toward institutional change reflecting anti-racist and decolonial principles.

    With this in mind, we are taking these preliminary actions:  

    --- Convening a task force to not only work toward greater attention to diversity and inclusion in the field of Italian Studies, but to assess how we might best incorporate and promote principles of anti-racism and de-coloniality into our organizational structure. We invite you to reach out if you are willing to serve. 

    --- Creating additional space for dialogue and exchange on the AAIS website, through the under-utilized “Forum” feature. While we no longer have a listserv, we do have a dedicated space for asynchronous exchange and we encourage you to use it. You will see here a new tab entitled “Confronting Structural Racism in Italian Studies,” with subfolders for sharing ideas, questions and materials such as syllabi. Change will come from exchange and, in addition to the focused work of the task force, we need more generative discussion from a broad base of membership.

    In order to arrive at ideas for concrete programming and policies that can address what one member has called “the unbearable whiteness of Italian Studies,” we must work actively, and collectively, toward change. The EC is committed to directing time, energy, and effort into development and implementation, but for programming to succeed, it must have input from members. 

    We want to register a clear condemnation of the racial injustices that happen around us every day. We want to (re)commit to the humanistic principles that undergird our intersecting and related fields. We invite you to join us. 

    AAIS Executive Council

    Ellen Nerenberg, Monica Seger, Eva Del Soldato & Cosetta Gaudenzi

    October 8, 2017

    Dear President Stanley, Provost Bernstein, and Dean Kopp:

    We write as the Executive Council of the American Association for Italian Studies (AAIS) to express our deep concern over cuts to the Humanities at Stony Brook University. In particular, we are gravely troubled by the recent non-renewal of three tenure-track faculty members in the College of Arts and Sciences.

    As tenured professors who work at diverse public universities (Northern Arizona University, The Ohio State University, the College of William & Mary, and Wayne State University), and who serve as deans, chairs, associate chairs, and faculty members, we are well aware of the kinds of budgetary pressures and other institutional challenges that Stony Brook University faces. We also feel very strongly that these pressures require us all to defend the integrity of humanities programs with more vigor than ever, and indeed to work to strengthen studies of comparative literature and culture, of migration, gender, race and ethnicity. In a year marked by xenophobic violence on the national stage and the recension of the DACA program, it is our responsibility as university faculty to bolster cross-cultural communication, innovative reasoning, and a deep awareness of cultural history. Some of the programs Stony Brook plans to cut are those best positioned to do this kind of critical work.

    Most urgently, in the face of financial constraints, it is imperative to protect the institution of tenure, along with the academic freedom and professional stability that it affords. Only faculty with such freedom and stability can develop and sustain programs of innovative research. Failing to follow the recommendation of a department, and its chair, to renew these three contracts risks weakening the tenure process across the university, and threatens it beyond Stony Brook as well. Although budgetary pressures are common at state institutions, austerity measures must not undermine the integrity of academic programs. We feel strongly that, at a university, the kinds of difficult choices made under financial pressures must still respect the intellectual priorities of the institution.

    At an institution whose diversity plan celebrates cultural awareness, and where a Global Studies program promises to teach students about the values of interconnectedness, the work being conducted by the tenure-track scholars being dismissed seems, ironically, to be precisely the kind of work that helps the university realize its mission.

    The three faculty being dismissed are pursuing critical research in areas that will be increasingly important as globalization continues to spur migration. They specialize, respectively, in works by Southeast Asian American authors and refugee artists, Middle Eastern women writers in French and Arabic, and Italian migrant writers and authors from

    the Horn of Africa. In Italian studies, we can affirm that research in migration studies is cutting-edge, and is positioned to become increasingly important as Italy continues to be on the frontlines of wave after wave of migration to Europe. Indeed, each of these faculty members was pursuing—and achieving—precisely the innovative and productive scholarship that we expect from faculty in tenure-track positions.

    We urge you to reconsider your decision to dismiss these three outstanding scholars, and hope that you will consider the alarming precedent set when tenure-track faculty can no longer rely on being evaluated on the merits of their scholarship.


    Valerio Ferme, President
    Dana Renga, Vice President 

    Monica Seger, Executive Secretary 
    Elena Past, Treasurer

    February 1, 2017

    Dear colleagues,

    We write as members of the executive of the American Association of Italian Studies to express our deep concern about the decision by our newly elected president to place restrictions and holds on the entry into the United States of many immigrants and visitors who have dutifully obtained permission to come live in or visit the country.

    Without getting into the validity of these decisions or the political issues that relate to them, we believe it is important to consider how these restrictions affect many of our colleagues, and graduate and undergraduate students, but also neighbors and others who come from countries affected by the executive orders. Many come from war torn areas, and have suffered tremendous personal losses, as well as already significant and extended scrutiny in obtaining the permissions that are now being questioned and put on hold. Others have already been victimized because, even though they practice a particular religion, it is not the specific current of that religion that others in their countries profess. Some decided to subject themselves to this uprooting spurred by the hope to be reunited with members of their families already in this country, or by the promise of leading a life that does not involve going to bed at night wondering if you will wake up in the morning still in one piece. 

    Why should this matter to us as members of the AAIS? It should for many reasons, none more important than as a reminder of how members of the culture and history we make our own once were equally victimized by executive orders and popular sentiment that we now see replicated toward others. We hope many of you have seen and read the article that our colleague and fellow member, Professor Anthony Tamburri, has written about his family’s personal experience with the Alien Enemies Act in 1942.

    We would like to go back even further in time to remind ourselves that Italians were once vilified and excluded as dangerous to the health of the nation in similar ways to those we are witnessing today. For example, the Johnson-Reed Act of 1924 (alternately known as the Immigration Act of 1924) was clearly meant to exclude Italian immigrants (who had come in droves in the period 1890-1920), since it restricted annual immigration from any country to 2% of the numbers from that country who had been living in the United States as of the 1890 census. Given how many more Italian (and Eastern European/Jewish) immigrants had come to the United States in the 1890-1920 years, the act obviously targeted and excluded them in primis. That was preceded in 1919 and 1920 by the infamous Palmer Raids, which targeted anarchists and political activists (many of whom were Italian) who were imprisoned and deported because their ideas were at odds with those of the government. Finally, to complete the analogy, threats to the wellbeing of Italian immigrants were often carried out in lynchings, none more egregious than the New Orleans lynching of 11 Italians in 1891 (the largest mass-lynching in American history), or the subsequent one of 5 Italian citizens in Tallulah, MS in 1899.

    We write, therefore, asking our membership to think about how it wishes to act moving forward. Regardless of our political convictions, stripes, colors, or religious affiliation, it behooves us to empathize with those who are subject to these new dispositions because, once in a past that is not that distant, many of our own relatives, families, and friends might have experienced similar disruptions and fearful holds on their movement into this country (for many with similar long delays or return trips to Italy). We also need, where possible, to join in questioning the appropriateness of these actions, not because our government does not have the power (if not necessarily the right) to enforce acts that it deems appropriate for its security; but because the targeted nature of these measures seems haphazard and capricious (as Professor Tamburri points out in his article, no citizens from the countries targeted by the executive orders have been responsible for terrorist acts on American soil). As we know, capriciousness and ideological exclusions have often led to behaviors and restrictions on human rights that have had and continue to have tremendous negative impacts on our fragile, commonly shared humanity.

    - The AAIS Executive Council

    Not a
    member yet?




    © American Association for Italian Studies 

    AAIS Senior Graduate Assistant, Julia  Pelosi-Thorpe  (   

    AAIS Graduate Assistant, Marcus Papandrea  ( 

    Powered by Wild Apricot Membership Software